Monday, 27 April 2015

Dr Peter J Gordon: “The progressive test” on Hole Ousia [reblog]

Dr Peter J Gordon: “The progressive test” on Hole Ousia:




"This commentary has recently been published:

008 Progressive Test

The commentary starts out stating that:

006 Progressive Test

But makes equally clear:

007 Progressive Test

A helpful definition of human rights is given:

002 Progressive Test

The Scottish Human Rights Commission outline five key questions that comprise “the progressive test”

004 Progressive Test

One of those five questions relates to:

005 Progressive Test

NHS Healthcare Improvement Scotland has, over the last few years, introduced mandatory “cognitive screening” for our elderly (generally considered those aged 65 and over). Such “cognitive screening” which I consider as a well-intentioned mandate, is nevertheless an example of a “blanket policy”.

I have found raising the subject of consent for cognitive screening a “difficult conversation” to have in NHS Scotland.

020 Progressive Test

As an NHS Consultant I use rating scales every day. As such I have come to appreciate what they can and cannot reveal about a patient.

Using brief scales for “screening”, rather than as part of an overall assessment, I consider a different matter. For screening, ten WHO criteria are required to be met. The UK National Screening Committee and all extant UK guidelines have concluded that these criteria have not been met for cognitive screening.

Notwithstanding, Scotland has chosen to follow “improvement methodology” to guide its approach. Here Scotland is a pioneer.

Here is the policy that was introduced by NHS Forth Valley following the approach of Healthcare Improvement Scotland:

NHS Forth Valley 8on mandatory screening

The current NHS Scotland hospital guide on consent makes clear:

018 Progressive Test

Where consent is defined as:

019 Progressive Test

In this week’s Lancet  there is a an editorial that advises that there is “wisdom in the bigger picture”:

 014 Progressive Test 015 Progressive Test

The above ethos is very much in accordance with Hole Ousia. The philosopher Mary Midgley was one of the first to raise the potential consequences of increasing specialisation (here, might we consider the division of the medical humanities from day-to-day medical care):

013 Progressive Test

This week’s Lancet editorial gives a timely reminder of a broader, rather than narrower, appreciation of cognition.

016 Progressive Test

I have tirelessly offered reminders why a “brief” “screening tool” may likely struggle to be “patient-centred”:

017 Progressive Test

It has been argued that cognitive screening in Scotland, using “cognitive screening tools”, is not screening at all but rather it is “identification” or “detection”.

I argue that a better approach for “identification” (for this to be more accurate and patient-centred) is for NHS staff to use their professional training and to be given time to attend to proper assessment. This means following time honoured clinical assessments rather than taking shorthands. I Should reaffirm, that it is the case that a rating scale may be part of this overall assessment.

Robert Louis Stevenson remarked in one of his philosophical essays:The philosopher Mary Midgley, now aged 95 years herself, has said:

011 Progressive Test

In Summary: I am of the view that mandatory cognitive screening introduced by NHS Scotland as part of “improvement science” does not meet the requirements of “the progressive test” as set out by the Scottish Human Rights Commission."


No comments:

Post a Comment